Obama on gambling

Obama on gambling wigan casino 3 before 8

We gaambling maintaining marriage between one man and one woman and would oppose any attempts to change that. Bush in their first terms. Now I understand the frustration of beat reporters who fly around the world with the president, at great expense to their news organizations, and rarely get near the guy.

Tuesday 29 March First published on Tuesday 29 March The cable news talking heads wanted to call it the "Obama doctrine", but Barack Obama's speech outlining his decision to intervene in Libya against the Gaddafi regime only added a new wrinkle to what we already know about the president's attitudes towards war and peace. Back in Obama gave a memorable speech that defined the hot case for unilateral US intervention and the deployment of US troops: Afghanistan, the result of a direct threat against the United States.

The same speech attacked gambling cold opposite: what Obama called the "dumb war" of the invasion of Iraq, where US national interests were not directly involved. Last night, in his televised address from the National Defense University at Fort McNair, Obama introduced an intermediate category for US military intervention: when there is support from the international community, when widely-defined US "interests and values" are at stake, when there is support from regional actors, and when there is a clear and urgent humanitarian demand.

In other gambling, when the gambling temperature is "just right". Call it the Goldilocks doctrine. Or, in Obama's description: We had a unique ability to stop that violence: obama international mandate for action, a broad coalition prepared to join us, the support of Arab countries, and a plea for help from the Libyan people themselves.

We also had the ability to stop Gaddafi's forces in their tracks without putting American troops on the ground. The needle Obama had to thread fiesta resort casino in costa rica night was distinguishing intervention in Libya from the other potential conflicts in the region, while still making a robust case for taking action that didn't extend towards an invasion.

That involved a degree of having it both ways, but Obama did deliver a crushing dismissal of more aggressive action against Gaddafi. But the ultimate step, of an invasion to drive out Gaddafi, could not casino us justified: If we tried to overthrow Gaddafi by force, our coalition would splinter.

We would likely have to put US troops on the ground, or risk killing many civilians from the air. The dangers faced by our men and women in uniform would be far greater. So would the costs, and our gambling of the responsibility for what comes next. To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq. Thanks to the extraordinary sacrifices of our troops and the determination of our diplomats, we are hopeful about Iraq's future. But regime change there took eight years, thousands of American and Iraqi lives, and nearly a trillion dollars.

That is not something we can afford to repeat in Libya. In doing so, Obama rebuffed the shrill charges of those Republicans who want to use any stick to beat him with. But that of course wouldn't stop them. Rudy Giuliani — for some reason elevated to foreign policy pundit by Piers Morgan on CNN — accused Obama of betting betting gambling italy sports sports "You either go in or you don't go in.

In Reagan ordered US warplanes to attack Gaddafi's regime. The US took no further military action, Gaddafi remained in power, and the Lockerbie tragedy followed. The hole in Obama's speech was his refusal to offer any limiting terms for US engagement.

If Gaddafi hangs on somehow, then eventually Obama will have to come up with an answer. By not doing so last night he gambled that he may never need to: Despite the success of our efforts over the past week, I know that some Americans continue to have questions about our efforts in Libya. Gaddafi has not yet stepped down from power, and until he does, Libya will remain dangerous.

Please choose your username under which you would like all your comments to show up. You can only set your username once. Our discussion threads are free to read but the creation of new comments is restricted to paying supporters only, obama. The Guardian - Back to home.

What term do you want to search?. Barack Obama made an intelligent, consistent case for limited US intervention in Libya, gambling on the toppling of Gaddafi. View more sharing options. This article is 6 years old. Or, in Obama's description:. We had a unique ability to stop that violence: an international mandate for action, a broad coalition prepared to join us, the support of Arab countries, and a plea for help from the Libyan people themselves.

If we tried to overthrow Gaddafi by force, our coalition would splinter. Despite the success of our efforts over the past week, I know that some Americans continue to have questions about our efforts in Libya. Middle East and North Africa. Loading comments… Trouble loading? Your comments are currently being pre-moderated why? Please keep comments respectful and abide by the community guidelines.

Obama gambles on getting Congress to green-light war with Syria. In a legacy-defining gamble, President Barack Obama announced Saturday that he has decided to launch military strikes against. Hey everyone leave comments if you enjoyed the accents, also leave comments for others you would like me to do. Lastly thanks for watching and subscribe, or DIE. As it turns out, the president also has disdain for local and state laws including those that ban or regulate gambling. A fellow democrat has outed Obama for a series of illegal bets he made over the.

2 comments